Why Do We Obey Rules – Mahit gadhiwala

Why Do We Obey Rules

To redress these injustices, we must break certain rules. As the saying goes, you can`t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs first. Psychologically, we feel that our knowledge transcends traditional hierarchies. This can include a parent to a child, a teacher to a student, or a citizen to a government. Society can obey a constitution on a piece of paper if it is constantly opposed and changed over time to please its citizens. If it stagnates, it will never develop real legitimacy or power. With an amending process, our U.S. Constitution gains more legitimacy, power, and obedience from us as a society because citizens see it as a flexible, just, and equitable social contract. The teacher points out to the class that people have a number of reasons for obeying the law. Some relate to self-interest, others concern others, and others concern themselves with the well-being of society as a whole (see note below). With this theory, all psychology that goes into obedience flies out the window. If we wanted to be liked by the “coolest” of our peers, we had to disobey. Good and evil were not factors.

Let`s look more at obedience to the individual by examining Milgram`s experience. Milgram wanted to know to what extent people obeyed an authority figure. Even if it is necessary to hurt another person. The results of Milgram`s experiment were surprisingly surprising. Rule of law: In democratic societies, governments and rulers are subject to the law of the land. Power changes democratically according to the rules of the country`s constitution, not as a result of violence or war. People have a general duty to obey the law because it is democratically decided. www.law.uchicago.edu/news/why-do-people-obey-law Unfortunately, the presence of CCTV cameras means that we usually do our best to comply with the rules. The risk of being caught red-handed is too great when you know you can be seen. “.

Some experimenters continued to administer the strongest electric shocks, although they were able to hear intense pain that they apparently caused. It is important to note that men were much more willing to obey the order to hurt the other person when an authority figure was in the room than when they were not present. [6] Similarly, our obedience can be influenced by rewarding power. In this case, we obey the rules and demands of others because we want to be rewarded. This can be praise, an increase or even rewards. Psychologically, rewards can have an even greater impact on our willingness to obey than fear of punishment. The agent state allowed them to hide behind their superiors and truly believed that they were innocent even if they committed monstrous acts. By convincing ourselves that we are not to blame, we are much more likely to obey even the worst orders. If we crave popularity or acceptance in a group, we will do whatever is necessary.

At school, the “popular children” tended to be the ones who broke the rules. They skipped classes, drank alcohol and took drugs. They ignored most of the rules set by teachers and parents, and they were revered for it. One philosophical point of view that needs to be examined comes from Max Weber. Weber explains his theory of modern obedience, which comes from “legal” authority. “Our modern `associations` are the kind of `legal` authority. The past has known other bases of authority, bases that, by the way, extend like vestiges to the present. “Charismatic authority” [and] “traditional authority”.

[2] The first part of this quote explains our modern obedience to law and order. In Weber`s view, we, as democratic citizens, have given up certain rights to a constitution that benefits our lives in society. The political leaders we elect must obey the Constitution and legislate to that standard. As citizens, we obey these laws because they are legitimized by the Constitution. Weber explains past legitimations based on “charismatic authority” or “traditional authority.” He explains that absolute rulers and religious leaders once had the power of obedience over the peoples of the world. These were legitimized by other reasons such as military victories or so-called “miracles”. According to McAdams, the law coordinates people by acting as a “focal point” to help people avoid conflict or other undesirable situations. As an example, he cites a one-way road sign that “we could imagine working without sanctions or legitimacy because it would be stupid to ignore it.” If you know that other people see this sign, you want to obey this sign, even if you know that there was no police department to avoid a head-on collision. Rule No. 42, says the king, is that all people who are more than a mile tall must leave the court. Alice replies that she is not a kilometre tall.

And anyway, it`s not a real rule, because the king invented it, at that time. “It`s the oldest rule in the book,” the king retorts. But when Alice points out that if the rule was so old, it should have been Rule No. 1, the king closes the notebook from which he read the rules (and wrote them down) and walks away from their argument. This is a rare moment in Lewis Carroll`s “Alice in Wonderland” in which the reasoning as we would recognize it turns out to be even minimally consistent. Alice`s Wonderland is a place where the only rule is that the rules will constantly change. One sacrifice makes you greater, another makes you small; It is always tea time because there is no time; And the rabbit with his broken clock is always late.